Dysfunctional Eating Precedes Addiction: An Inverted Story
During rehab I put five or six sugars in every cup of tea and drank five or six cups a day. My smoking surpassed any previous level. Eventually a staff member remarked on the sugar, and that remark was the full extent of the clinical interest it attracted. The unit had ten people. Nobody was looking for an eating disorder, so nobody found one. I had quit heroin a few weeks earlier, and even then I knew exactly what I was doing with the tea. I needed a new prop. Simply put, I moved to another cabin on the Titanic. In twenty‑five years working in addiction, eating disorders and trauma, I now expect to see this pattern in nearly every man who gets sober. That is why I argue that men in recovery replace addiction with an eating disorder.
Wellness insights
Brain Wiring Explains Why Trauma Victims Struggle To Find Joy
Healing Journey: A Therapist Reflects on Processing Deep Childhood Trauma
Forest walks boost mood through sound and biodiversity awareness
What Counselling in Two Different Countries Taught Me: Hansel Wong on Connection, Curiosity, and CultureWhat I failed to grasp then, and what I believe addiction services still largely miss, is the order in which these problems appear. The usual story is reversed. When this pattern is described at all, the narrative says someone recovers from addiction and then develops an eating disorder, as if it were a new problem emerging in recovery. That was not my experience and it is not what I see in the room. I was bulimic at eight or nine years old. I began using heroin at twelve or thirteen. The eating disorder did not disappear when drugs appeared. It became quiet and turned into the smaller problem because something noisier took over the role it had played. When I stopped using, it was still there, waiting exactly where I had left it. So nothing emerged in recovery. Something was uncovered.
The eating disorder was the initial condition, and addiction was the secondary layer; removing that layer did not create a new illness. It eliminated what was hiding the first one. This matters for how you act. A problem that just appeared can be observed. A problem that has been present since elementary school and hidden for fifteen years is a completely different proposition and will not be resolved by a counselor mentioning biscuits. Why eating disorders remain invisible. Part of the reason is that substance and food were never truly separate things. Alcohol is liquid sugar. For many people, drinking and overeating are a single urge wearing whatever outfit is available that evening, and when you take the drink, the urge does not leave with it. The other part is the substitution effect.
Research has consistently shown that people with eating disorders abuse substances at rates far higher than the general population, and the relationship works in both directions. But what a man does in early addiction recovery often does not look like an illness at all. It looks like progress. He is at the gym daily, has cut out entire food groups, and is now disciplined. Behavior that would worry everyone if it involved a bottle becomes, in this form, what his friends praise him for. Beat makes the same point from the opposite direction, noting that excessive exercise is read as normal male behavior, which is part of why men are not identified. I have found a question that quickly clarifies the situation. Can you skip the gym just once and stay home with what comes up? For some men this is a slightly unsettling idea.
For others it is unthinkable, and that unthinkability is the answer
For others it is unthinkable, and that unthinkability is the answer. The part nobody says out loud. Here is what makes things complicated, and I offer it as something that happened to me, not as a recommendation. In early recovery my eating disorder kept me away from heroin. Relapse is a symptom of addiction, not a moral failure. If someone has the flu, a symptom is coughing, and you do not overcome it by willing yourself not to cough. It is the same here, and I wish more professionals would treat it that way. But I would have relapsed on something, and what I relapsed on was food. It was not good. It was better than crack. So when a counselor sees a man in week three still loading his tea with sugar, the honest answer is not simply to take it away. He is holding on to something.
Remove his last prop while everything else has already gone, and you may discover what he was clinging to. Leaving everything as it is is not the answer either, because untreated it will ultimately lead him back to substance. Exactly what research predicts when treating one condition while ignoring the other. The answer is to name it early, without alarm, and to plan for it as a second condition in its own right, not as a quirk of early sobriety. It must also be said that this is not a problem you finish. You can quit heroin, but you cannot quit eating. I quit drugs, then I quit smoking, and eating has been a management question ever since. It is not something I have cured. It is something I continue to manage. The one question that should be asked of every man in treatment.
What I would ask is a single question, addressed to every man entering addiction treatment and posed appropriately, not ticking a box: what was your relationship with food before any of these problems began? Not what it is now. Before. For a significant number of men, the answer will be the condition you are actually treating. Frequently Asked Questions Do eating disorders truly begin during addiction recovery? Often they do not begin there at all. In many cases the eating disorder came first, and alcohol or drugs covered it up until stopping the substance uncovered it again. How commonly do eating disorders and substance abuse co‑occur? The relationship works in both directions. Why do addiction services still miss this?
Because the focus is often on the substance, not the underlying eating pattern, and because behaviors like excessive exercise or strict dieting are praised as signs of progress rather than seen as symptoms.